China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Savanna — Burning crop residues

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 t
in 2024
Lithuania
0 t
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
119th
Lithuania rank
119th

Savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Lithuania
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199020072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 119th and Lithuania ranks 119th of 221 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 387.6 t 563.98 t 176.38 t Lithuania
2000s 770.01 t 2,856 t 2,086 t Lithuania
2010s 1,046 t 353.62 t 692.34 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 719.43 t 123.77 t 595.66 t China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, China, Hong Kong SAR or Lithuania?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
0 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 119th and Lithuania ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/lithuania/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.