Ecuador vs Nepal: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Ecuador
264,468 t
in 2024
Nepal
306,481 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
51st
Nepal rank
50th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Ecuador
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 306,481 t against 264,468 t in Ecuador, a difference of 42,013 t.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 50th of 221 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73,476 t | 47,212 t | 26,264 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 83,613 t | 44,560 t | 39,052 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 134,332 t | 76,514 t | 57,818 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 182,920 t | 174,785 t | 8,136 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Ecuador or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 306,481 t against 264,468 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Ecuador and Nepal?
- 42,013 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 50th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.