El Salvador vs Georgia: Savanna — Burning crop residues
El Salvador
4,790 t
in 2024
Georgia
5,025 t
in 2024
El Salvador rank
89th
Georgia rank
88th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- El Salvador
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 5,025 t against 4,790 t in El Salvador, a difference of 235 t.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 89th and Georgia ranks 88th of 221 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,586 t | 2,976 t | 4,610 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 9,546 t | 2,387 t | 7,159 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 22,445 t | 6,197 t | 16,248 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 8,401 t | 5,377 t | 3,023 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, El Salvador or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 5,025 t against 4,790 t in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between El Salvador and Georgia?
- 235 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- El Salvador ranks 89th and Georgia ranks 88th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.