Eritrea vs Mauritius: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Eritrea
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Eritrea rank
119th
Mauritius rank
119th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Eritrea
- Mauritius
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41,134 t | 109.61 t | 41,025 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 8,758 t | 53.72 t | 8,704 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 t | 14.98 t | 14.98 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Eritrea or Mauritius?
- Eritrea, at 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Eritrea and Mauritius?
- 0 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Mauritius rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Eritrea ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.