Eswatini vs Peru: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Eswatini
204,875 t
in 2024
Peru
209,732 t
in 2024
Eswatini rank
56th
Peru rank
53rd
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Eswatini
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 209,732 t against 204,875 t in Eswatini, a difference of 4,857 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 56th and Peru ranks 53rd of 221 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 119,069 t | 43,931 t | 75,138 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 61,937 t | 54,437 t | 7,500 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 103,499 t | 74,253 t | 29,246 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 106,689 t | 104,808 t | 1,881 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Eswatini or Peru?
- Peru, at 209,732 t against 204,875 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Eswatini and Peru?
- 4,857 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Peru rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Eswatini ranks 56th and Peru ranks 53rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.