Mauritius vs Slovakia: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Slovakia
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
119th
Slovakia rank
119th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Mauritius
- Slovakia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Slovakia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 119th and Slovakia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109.61 t | 10.45 t | 99.16 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 53.72 t | 44.76 t | 8.97 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 14.98 t | 0 t | 14.98 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Slovakia?
- Mauritius, at 0 t against 0 t in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Slovakia?
- 0 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Slovakia rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Mauritius ranks 119th and Slovakia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.