Cuba vs Sudan: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … capita
Cuba
0.0297 t per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0328 t per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
39th
Sudan rank
38th
Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … capita over time
- Cuba
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0328 t per person against 0.0297 t per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0031 t per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Cuba ranks 39th and Sudan ranks 38th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0205 t per person | 0.0371 t per person | 0.0167 t per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0386 t per person | 0.0321 t per person | 0.0066 t per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Cuba or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0328 t per person against 0.0297 t per person in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Cuba and Sudan?
- 0.0031 t per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Sudan rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
- Cuba ranks 39th and Sudan ranks 38th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.