Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … capita

Papua New Guinea
0.0422 t per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0742 t per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
33rd

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … capita over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0742 t per person against 0.0422 t per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.032 t per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.8 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0912 t per person 1.03 t per person 0.9341 t per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0915 t per person 0.3116 t per person 0.22 t per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0705 t per person 0.2224 t per person 0.1519 t per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0447 t per person 0.0782 t per person 0.0335 t per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0742 t per person against 0.0422 t per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.032 t per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Papua New Guinea ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,504 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.