Canada vs Guatemala: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Canada
2.16 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
2.24 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
33rd
Guatemala rank
32nd

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Canada
  • Guatemala
01234199020062023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 2.24 t per square kilometre against 2.16 t per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.08 t per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 33rd and Guatemala ranks 32nd of 188 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1762 t per square kilometre 1.97 t per square kilometre 1.79 t per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.211 t per square kilometre 2.7 t per square kilometre 2.49 t per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.3032 t per square kilometre 2.4 t per square kilometre 2.1 t per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.6236 t per square kilometre 2.11 t per square kilometre 1.48 t per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Canada or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 2.24 t per square kilometre against 2.16 t per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Canada and Guatemala?
0.08 t per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Guatemala?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Canada and Guatemala rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Canada ranks 33rd and Guatemala ranks 32nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Guatemala: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/canada/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/canada/guatemala/">Canada vs Guatemala: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.