Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Equatorial Guinea
0.0053 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.0094 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
91st
Serbia rank
88th

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
00.20.40.60.8199020062023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.0094 t per square kilometre against 0.0053 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0041 t per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.8 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 88th of 188 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0.2036 t per square kilometre 0.2036 t per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0769 t per square kilometre 0.0769 t per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0451 t per square kilometre 0.0438 t per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.0094 t per square kilometre against 0.0053 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0.0041 t per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 88th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.