Iceland vs Mauritius: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Iceland
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
108th
Mauritius rank
108th

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritius
00.10.20.3199020062023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.

Iceland ranks 108th and Mauritius ranks 108th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0445 t per square kilometre 0.0432 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0265 t per square kilometre 0.0263 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Iceland or Mauritius?
Iceland, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Iceland and Mauritius?
0 t per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Iceland ranks 108th and Mauritius ranks 108th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritius: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritius/">Iceland vs Mauritius: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.