Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Myanmar
2.77 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3.66 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
31st
Zimbabwe rank
29th

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Myanmar
  • Zimbabwe
0204060199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.66 t per square kilometre against 2.77 t per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 0.89 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Myanmar ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1.65 t per square kilometre 29.74 t per square kilometre 28.09 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2.61 t per square kilometre 9.86 t per square kilometre 7.25 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 3.13 t per square kilometre 8.18 t per square kilometre 5.05 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 2.47 t per square kilometre 3.28 t per square kilometre 0.8074 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.66 t per square kilometre against 2.77 t per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
0.89 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Myanmar ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/zimbabwe/">Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.