How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Uruguay: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) … unit

Chile

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Uruguay

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

70th

Uruguay rank

71st

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) … unit over time

Chile
Uruguay

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Uruguay, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.

Chile ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 185 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
2000s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
2010s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
2020s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Chile or Uruguay?: Chile, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Chile and Uruguay?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?: Chile ranks 70th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Uruguay: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/uruguay/">Chile vs Uruguay: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.