Eswatini vs Sudan: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) … unit
Eswatini
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
22nd
Sudan rank
23rd
Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) … unit over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 22nd and Sudan ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
- Eswatini ranks 22nd and Sudan ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.