Finland vs Lesotho: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Finland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Lesotho
-100 % change on previous year
in 2002
Finland rank
123rd
Lesotho rank
123rd
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Finland
- Lesotho
How they compare
Finland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lesotho, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lesotho ahead.
Finland ranks 123rd and Lesotho ranks 123rd of 165 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -9.26 % change on previous year | 51.53 % change on previous year | 60.79 % change on previous year | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 100 % change on previous year | -58.08 % change on previous year | 158.08 % change on previous year | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Finland or Lesotho?
- Finland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lesotho as of 2020.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Finland and Lesotho?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Lesotho?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2002.
- How do Finland and Lesotho rank globally for savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- Finland ranks 123rd and Lesotho ranks 123rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.