Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
11.26 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
325 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th
New Zealand rank
11th

Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • New Zealand
-2000200400600199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 325 % change on previous year against 11.26 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 313.74 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 28.9 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s -3.35 % change on previous year -16.67 % change on previous year 13.32 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 5.89 % change on previous year -27.71 % change on previous year 33.6 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s -1.76 % change on previous year 73.96 % change on previous year 75.72 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 1.38 % change on previous year 57.95 % change on previous year 56.57 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 325 % change on previous year against 11.26 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
313.74 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
23 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand rank globally for savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-zealand/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 5,507 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.