Niger vs Norway: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Niger
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Niger rank
123rd
Norway rank
123rd
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- Niger
- Norway
How they compare
Niger currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.
Niger ranks 123rd and Norway ranks 123rd of 165 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 80.44 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 97.11 % change on previous year | Niger |
| 2000s | -85 % change on previous year | 8.33 % change on previous year | 93.33 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Niger or Norway?
- Niger, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2017.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Niger and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Norway?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2007.
- How do Niger and Norway rank globally for savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- Niger ranks 123rd and Norway ranks 123rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.