Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Savanna — Emissions

Australia and New Zealand
41.85 kt
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
732.11 kt
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
10th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

Savanna — Emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0200400600800199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 732.11 kt against 41.85 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 690.26 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 17.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 221 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 119.89 kt 557.76 kt 437.87 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 96.88 kt 591.42 kt 494.54 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 74.97 kt 718.64 kt 643.67 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 51.18 kt 710.15 kt 658.97 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 732.11 kt against 41.85 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
690.26 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for savanna — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Savanna — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Savanna — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.