Austria vs Barbados: Savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Austria
0 kt
in 2024
Barbados
0 kt
in 2024
Austria rank
119th
Barbados rank
119th
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Austria
- Barbados
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Barbados, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 119th and Barbados ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Barbados in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Austria or Barbados?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Austria and Barbados?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Barbados?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Barbados rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Austria ranks 119th and Barbados ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.