China vs Philippines: Savanna — Emissions (CH4)
China
0.7532 kt
in 2024
Philippines
0.9667 kt
in 2024
China rank
47th
Philippines rank
45th
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) over time
- China
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.9667 kt against 0.7532 kt in China, a difference of 0.2135 kt.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
China ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 45th of 221 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.45 kt | 0.3187 kt | 1.13 kt | China |
| 2000s | 3.66 kt | 0.5516 kt | 3.11 kt | China |
| 2010s | 2.37 kt | 0.623 kt | 1.75 kt | China |
| 2020s | 1.15 kt | 0.5429 kt | 0.6081 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, China or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 0.9667 kt against 0.7532 kt in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between China and Philippines?
- 0.2135 kt, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Philippines rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- China ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 45th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.