Eritrea vs Serbia and Montenegro: Savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Eritrea
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Eritrea rank
119th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
119th
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Eritrea
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0946 kt | 0.0028 kt | 0.0919 kt | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0336 kt | 0.0055 kt | 0.028 kt | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Eritrea or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Eritrea and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Eritrea and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Eritrea ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.