Grenada vs Mauritius: Savanna — Emissions
Grenada
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2024
Grenada rank
119th
Mauritius rank
119th
Savanna — Emissions over time
- Grenada
- Mauritius
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 216 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Grenada or Mauritius?
- Grenada, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Grenada and Mauritius?
- 0 kt, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Grenada ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.