Libya vs Samoa: Savanna — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Samoa
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
131st
Samoa rank
131st
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Samoa
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Samoa, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 131st and Samoa ranks 131st of 238 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Libya or Samoa?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Libya and Samoa?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Samoa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Samoa rank globally for savanna — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 131st and Samoa ranks 131st of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.