Mauritius vs Serbia and Montenegro: Savanna — Emissions
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Mauritius rank
119th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
119th
Savanna — Emissions over time
- Mauritius
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0031 kt | 0.0028 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0055 kt | 0.0055 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Mauritius or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Mauritius and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Mauritius and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Mauritius ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.