Serbia and Montenegro vs Vanuatu: Savanna — Emissions
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Vanuatu
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro rank
119th
Vanuatu rank
119th
Savanna — Emissions over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th and Vanuatu ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0031 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.003 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 0.0055 kt | 0 kt | 0.0055 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Serbia and Montenegro or Vanuatu?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Vanuatu as of 2005.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Serbia and Montenegro and Vanuatu?
- 0 kt, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Vanuatu?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Vanuatu rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th and Vanuatu ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.