Chile vs Iceland: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Chile
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iceland
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
70th
Iceland rank
72nd
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Iceland
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Iceland, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 70th and Iceland ranks 72nd of 185 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Chile or Iceland?
- Chile, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Chile and Iceland?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 70th and Iceland ranks 72nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.