Iraq vs Japan: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Iraq
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Japan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq rank
105th
Japan rank
108th
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Iraq
- Japan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Japan, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Iraq's figure about 2.5 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 105th and Japan ranks 108th of 185 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Iraq or Japan?
- Iraq, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Iraq and Japan?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Japan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Japan rank globally for savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Iraq ranks 105th and Japan ranks 108th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.