Latvia vs Lithuania: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lithuania
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
112th
Lithuania rank
112th
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.
Latvia ranks 112th and Lithuania ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Latvia or Lithuania?
- Latvia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Latvia and Lithuania?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lithuania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Lithuania rank globally for savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 112th and Lithuania ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.