Denmark vs Iraq: Savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Denmark
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Iraq
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Denmark rank
115th
Iraq rank
115th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Denmark
- Iraq
How they compare
Denmark currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iraq, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Iraq ahead.
Denmark ranks 115th and Iraq ranks 115th of 153 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -16.67 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 16.67 % change on previous year | Iraq |
| 2000s | 125 % change on previous year | 16.67 % change on previous year | 108.33 % change on previous year | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Denmark or Iraq?
- Denmark, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iraq as of 2008.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Denmark and Iraq?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Iraq?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2008.
- How do Denmark and Iraq rank globally for savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Denmark ranks 115th and Iraq ranks 115th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.