Lithuania vs Sweden: Savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Lithuania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Lithuania rank
115th
Sweden rank
115th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Lithuania
- Sweden
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 115th and Sweden ranks 115th of 153 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -25 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Lithuania or Sweden?
- Lithuania, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Lithuania and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2007.
- How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Lithuania ranks 115th and Sweden ranks 115th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.