Australia vs Oceania: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Australia
3.82 kt
in 2024
Oceania
3.92 kt
in 2024
Australia rank
11th
Oceania rank
12th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Australia
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 3.92 kt against 3.82 kt in Australia, a difference of 0.1 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 11th and Oceania ranks 12th of 221 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.95 kt | 11.03 kt | 0.0863 kt | Oceania |
| 2000s | 8.85 kt | 8.97 kt | 0.128 kt | Oceania |
| 2010s | 6.84 kt | 6.98 kt | 0.1307 kt | Oceania |
| 2020s | 4.67 kt | 4.77 kt | 0.1002 kt | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Australia or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 3.92 kt against 3.82 kt in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Australia and Oceania?
- 0.1 kt, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Oceania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Oceania rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Australia ranks 11th and Oceania ranks 12th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.