Austria vs Mauritius: Savanna — Emissions
Austria
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2024
Austria rank
111th
Mauritius rank
111th
Savanna — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Mauritius
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Austria ranks 111th and Mauritius ranks 111th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Austria or Mauritius?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Austria and Mauritius?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Mauritius rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Austria ranks 111th and Mauritius ranks 111th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.