Bangladesh vs Sweden: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Bangladesh
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
111th
Sweden rank
111th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Bangladesh
- Sweden
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 111th and Sweden ranks 111th of 221 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0005 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0.0009 kt | 0 kt | 0.0009 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0006 kt | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Bangladesh or Sweden?
- Bangladesh, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Bangladesh and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Sweden rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Bangladesh ranks 111th and Sweden ranks 111th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.