Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Belarus
0.0004 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0.0003 kt
in 2024
Belarus rank
92nd
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belarus
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.0004 kt against 0.0003 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Belarus ranks 92nd and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0028 kt | 0.0167 kt | 0.014 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0066 kt | 0.0383 kt | 0.0317 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0066 kt | 0.013 kt | 0.0064 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0048 kt | 0.0042 kt | 0.0006 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Belarus or Sri Lanka?
- Belarus, at 0.0004 kt against 0.0003 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0001 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 92nd and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.