Ecuador vs Guatemala: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Ecuador
0.0555 kt
in 2024
Guatemala
0.0437 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
51st
Guatemala rank
54th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ecuador
- Guatemala
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0555 kt against 0.0437 kt in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0118 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Guatemala ranks 54th of 221 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0154 kt | 0.0442 kt | 0.0288 kt | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.0176 kt | 0.0607 kt | 0.0432 kt | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.0282 kt | 0.0541 kt | 0.0259 kt | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.0384 kt | 0.0466 kt | 0.0082 kt | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Ecuador or Guatemala?
- Ecuador, at 0.0555 kt against 0.0437 kt in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Ecuador and Guatemala?
- 0.0118 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guatemala?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Guatemala rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Guatemala ranks 54th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.