Ecuador vs Nepal: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Ecuador
0.0555 kt
in 2024
Nepal
0.0644 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
51st
Nepal rank
50th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ecuador
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.0644 kt against 0.0555 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0089 kt.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 50th of 221 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0154 kt | 0.0099 kt | 0.0056 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.0176 kt | 0.0094 kt | 0.0082 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0282 kt | 0.0161 kt | 0.0121 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0384 kt | 0.0367 kt | 0.0017 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Ecuador or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0.0644 kt against 0.0555 kt in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Ecuador and Nepal?
- 0.0089 kt, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 50th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.