Ecuador vs Peru: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Ecuador
0.0555 kt
in 2024
Peru
0.044 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
51st
Peru rank
53rd
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0555 kt against 0.044 kt in Peru, a difference of 0.0115 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Peru ranks 53rd of 221 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0154 kt | 0.0092 kt | 0.0062 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.0176 kt | 0.0114 kt | 0.0061 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0282 kt | 0.0156 kt | 0.0126 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0384 kt | 0.022 kt | 0.0164 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Ecuador or Peru?
- Ecuador, at 0.0555 kt against 0.044 kt in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Ecuador and Peru?
- 0.0115 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Peru ranks 53rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.