Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Malawi
0.2531 kt
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.2591 kt
in 2024
Malawi rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
34th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2591 kt against 0.2531 kt in Malawi, a difference of 0.006 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malawi ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3298 kt | 2.42 kt | 2.09 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.3428 kt | 0.8012 kt | 0.4584 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.3273 kt | 0.6642 kt | 0.3369 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.2823 kt | 0.265 kt | 0.0173 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.2591 kt against 0.2531 kt in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 0.006 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Malawi ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.