Mauritius vs Uzbekistan: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritius rank
111th
Uzbekistan rank
111th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Mauritius
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Mauritius ranks 111th and Uzbekistan ranks 111th of 221 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Mauritius or Uzbekistan?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Mauritius and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Uzbekistan rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Mauritius ranks 111th and Uzbekistan ranks 111th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.