New Caledonia vs Serbia: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
New Caledonia
0.0094 kt
in 2024
Serbia
0.0071 kt
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
66th
Serbia rank
68th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- New Caledonia
- Serbia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.0094 kt against 0.0071 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0.0023 kt.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 66th and Serbia ranks 68th of 221 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0013 kt | 0.0037 kt | 0.0024 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.002 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0006 kt | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.0038 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0018 kt | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, New Caledonia or Serbia?
- New Caledonia, at 0.0094 kt against 0.0071 kt in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 0.0023 kt, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Serbia rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- New Caledonia ranks 66th and Serbia ranks 68th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.