New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Savanna — Emissions (N2O)
New Zealand
0.0003 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0.0003 kt
in 2024
New Zealand rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) over time
- New Zealand
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.0003 kt against 0.0003 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
New Zealand ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 221 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0174 kt | 0.0173 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0383 kt | 0.0382 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0.013 kt | 0.0127 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0042 kt | 0.004 kt | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, New Zealand or Sri Lanka?
- New Zealand, at 0.0003 kt against 0.0003 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Sri Lanka rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- New Zealand ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.