Serbia and Montenegro vs Sweden: Savanna — Emissions
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro rank
111th
Sweden rank
111th
Savanna — Emissions over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Sweden
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 111th and Sweden ranks 111th of 221 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0002 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions, Serbia and Montenegro or Sweden?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2005.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions between Serbia and Montenegro and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Sweden rank globally for savanna — emissions?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 111th and Sweden ranks 111th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.