Ecuador vs Portugal: Savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2024
Portugal
0 kt per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
49th
Portugal rank
51st
Savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Portugal
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 49th and Portugal ranks 51st of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Portugal |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Portugal |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita, Ecuador or Portugal?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita between Ecuador and Portugal?
- 0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Portugal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Portugal rank globally for savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 49th and Portugal ranks 51st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.