Australia and New Zealand vs Namibia: Savanna fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
-52.02 % change on previous year
in 2024
Namibia
-56.22 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
117th
Namibia rank
119th

Savanna fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Namibia
-1000100200300400199120072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports -52.02 % change on previous year against -56.22 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 4.2 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 119th of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 5.07 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year 3.78 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2000s 10.17 % change on previous year 7.93 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2010s 34.84 % change on previous year -9.05 % change on previous year 43.89 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2020s 26.92 % change on previous year 36.58 % change on previous year 9.66 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Namibia?
Australia and New Zealand, at -52.02 % change on previous year against -56.22 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
4.2 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Namibia rank globally for savanna fires — burned area, annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 119th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Namibia: Savanna fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/namibia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Namibia: Savanna fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 6,378 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.