Asia vs Australia and New Zealand: Savanna fires — Burned Area

Asia
6.02 million ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand
34.24 million ha
in 2024
Asia rank
5th
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd

Savanna fires — Burned Area over time

  • Asia
  • Australia and New Zealand
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 34.24 million ha against 6.02 million ha in Asia, a difference of 28.23 million ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 5.7 times Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Asia ranks 5th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 22 groups.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 11.80 million ha 44.98 million ha 33.18 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 17.43 million ha 53.82 million ha 36.39 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 13.14 million ha 46.21 million ha 33.07 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 8.00 million ha 34.74 million ha 26.74 million ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Asia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 34.24 million ha against 6.02 million ha in Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Asia and Australia and New Zealand?
28.23 million ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Australia and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Asia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
Asia ranks 5th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 22 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia vs Australia and New Zealand: Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/asia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/asia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Asia vs Australia and New Zealand: Savanna fires — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.