Australia and New Zealand vs South Sudan: Savanna fires — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
34.24 million ha
in 2024
South Sudan
24.46 million ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd
South Sudan rank
6th

Savanna fires — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • South Sudan
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 34.24 million ha against 24.46 million ha in South Sudan, a difference of 9.79 million ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 6th of 221 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 44.72 million ha 25.18 million ha 19.54 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 34.74 million ha 22.70 million ha 12.04 million ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or South Sudan?
Australia and New Zealand, at 34.24 million ha against 24.46 million ha in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and South Sudan?
9.79 million ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and South Sudan?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and South Sudan rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 6th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs South Sudan: Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/south-sudan/">Australia and New Zealand vs South Sudan: Savanna fires — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.