Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Savanna fires — Burned Area

Australia
34.24 million ha
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
183.09 million ha
in 2024
Australia rank
4th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
1st

Savanna fires — Burned Area over time

  • Australia
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M199020072024

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 183.09 million ha against 34.24 million ha in Australia, a difference of 148.85 million ha.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 5.3 times Australia's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st of 221 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 44.98 million ha 191.01 million ha 146.03 million ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 53.82 million ha 203.96 million ha 150.14 million ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 46.21 million ha 187.89 million ha 141.68 million ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 34.74 million ha 176.70 million ha 141.97 million ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Australia or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 183.09 million ha against 34.24 million ha in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
148.85 million ha, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
Australia ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Savanna fires — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.