Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Bangladesh
47,874 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
50,070 ha
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
70th
Rwanda rank
69th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Bangladesh
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 50,070 ha against 47,874 ha in Bangladesh, a difference of 2,196 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,526 ha | 23,738 ha | 6,212 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 37,532 ha | 20,516 ha | 17,017 ha | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 24,747 ha | 35,592 ha | 10,845 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 32,618 ha | 39,813 ha | 7,195 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 50,070 ha against 47,874 ha in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
- 2,196 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Bangladesh ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.