Belarus vs Italy: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Belarus
5,022 ha
in 2024
Italy
4,512 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
99th
Italy rank
100th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- Italy
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 5,022 ha against 4,512 ha in Italy, a difference of 510 ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 99th and Italy ranks 100th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,276 ha | 13,724 ha | 3,449 ha | Italy |
| 2000s | 26,477 ha | 16,839 ha | 9,638 ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 20,889 ha | 13,771 ha | 7,118 ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 10,228 ha | 18,755 ha | 8,527 ha | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Belarus or Italy?
- Belarus, at 5,022 ha against 4,512 ha in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Belarus and Italy?
- 510 ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 99th and Italy ranks 100th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.