Belarus vs Uruguay: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Belarus
5,022 ha
in 2024
Uruguay
5,836 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
99th
Uruguay rank
97th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 5,836 ha against 5,022 ha in Belarus, a difference of 814 ha.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Belarus ranks 99th and Uruguay ranks 97th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,276 ha | 13,004 ha | 2,729 ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 26,477 ha | 25,958 ha | 518.94 ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 20,889 ha | 17,972 ha | 2,917 ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 10,228 ha | 18,293 ha | 8,065 ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 5,836 ha against 5,022 ha in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 814 ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 99th and Uruguay ranks 97th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.